Supreme Court Will Review Texas and Florida Laws Limiting Social Media From Moderating Comments





The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday said it would review two separate laws from Texas and Florida that place restrictions on how social media companies can moderate comments on their platform, wading into a fierce battle over free speech.

The cases deal with a Texas and Florida law, both enacted in 2021, that opponents argue hurts social media’s ability to stamp out misinformation and toxic content that constitutes harassment. Supporters say the laws are meant to prevent social media companies from censoring based on certain opinions — both sprung from Republicans’ claims that the platforms were silencing conservative perspectives.

NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association, or CCIA, are two trade groups that represent companies like Google, Meta, X sued filed lawsuits in both states and sought Supreme Court review after seeing legal defeats in the lower courts.

The rulings could have a broad impact on free speech on social media and what kind of content you’ll see. Social media companies pulling back on moderation could mean a rise of misinformation and toxic content. A decision in favor of the two state laws could also set a precedent for other states looking to enact their own bills.

The Florida law targets social media companies making at least $100 million or have at least 100 million monthly active users. It bans certain types of content moderation, while requiring platforms to notify a user if they remove or edit a post and provide a reason. It also requires that the companies be more transparent and publish their standards for moderation.

The Texas law targets social media companies with more than 50 million monthly active users also imposes restrictions on content moderation, requires they alert users when their content is removed, that they disclose how they moderate and target content, and mandate the use of algorithms to rank posts.

Officials from both states believe regulation is needed given how powerful these companies are. But the trade groups say these lawsuits were filed because officials didn’t like how these companies exercised their editorial judgment.

The cases are CCIA and NetChoice vs. Florida State Attorney General Ashley Moody and CCIA and NetChoice vs. Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Disclaimer: To address the growing use of ad blockers we now use affiliate links to sites like, streaming services, and others. Affiliate links help sites like Cord Cutters News, stay open. Affiliate links cost you nothing but help me support my family. We do not allow paid reviews on this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from :

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp’s privacy practices here.