Government Program Offers Millions to Internet Providers, But It Mostly Goes to Comcast, AT&T, & Spectrum





U.S. broadband is getting an increase in public funding, the largest ever in broadband history, through the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program.

As stated by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration:

“The Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Programs provides $42.45 billion to expand high-speed internet access by funding planning, infrastructure deployment, and adoption programs in all 50 states, Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.”

Originally, the BEAD program was intended to help improve local, public networks such as non-profits, co-operatives, and other entities affiliated with local governments. This program was supposed to help level the playing field for smaller companies against giant providers. But is that really the case as the plan moves forward?

Once again, the larger providers are trying to snuff out any chance of competition with smaller or new companies. They benefit from a lack of options and some even are one of possibly two providers available in many areas.

Where the program money goes is essentially left up to the states and territories. Meaning, smaller companies have the right to file for grant money but can be denied in favor of larger, already well-established providers. The Verge reports “In nearly one-third of the U.S., that decision may have already been made,” stating 16 states already have laws protecting major telecom companies.

According to Karl Bode, “This is a historic infusion of broadband subsidies that will absolutely result in a lot of amazing progress. At the same time, there’s just endless potential for fraud and misuse of funding, given monopoly telecom’s influence on the legislative process.”

Since 2002, companies such as Comcast, AT&T, Cox, Lumen, and Verizon already have deals with lobbyists to protect their stake in the internet industry. Without funding, the smaller companies cannot compete with the tele-giants, which is exactly what the big telecom companies want. Eliminating any chance of receiving funding while shifting millions to aid the current tele-giants further erases any hope of competing in an essentially sealed market.

If a smaller company does try to get its foot in the industry, major telecom companies can simply outprice them, temporarily enticing customers to join their own service with limited price cuts before driving the prices back up after eliminating the competition.

Disclaimer: To address the growing use of ad blockers we now use affiliate links to sites like, streaming services, and others. Affiliate links help sites like Cord Cutters News, stay open. Affiliate links cost you nothing but help me support my family. We do not allow paid reviews on this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

* indicates required

Please select all the ways you would like to hear from :

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp’s privacy practices here.