Two Pennsylvania state representatives are spearheading a bold new effort to restore net neutrality protections by transforming internet service providers (ISPs) into public utilities. Representatives Ismail Smith-Wade-El (D-49) and Elizabeth Fiedler (D-184) have circulated a memo outlining a forthcoming bill that promises “fair Internet that provides equal access” to all Pennsylvanians, tackling what they see as unchecked corporate overreach in the wake of federal deregulation according to a report from ABC 27.
The proposed legislation, still in draft form and not yet introduced to the state legislature, aims to rein in large ISPs by imposing strict rules to ensure equitable service. According to the memo, the bill would prohibit providers from blocking lawful content, throttling internet traffic, or engaging in practices that degrade user experience. It also seeks to prevent ISPs from manipulating access or jacking up consumer prices based on content or usage—a direct response to what the lawmakers call a “rollback of necessary protections” at the federal level.
Reps. Smith-Wade-El and Fiedler point to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) January 2 decision to dismantle its net neutrality rules as the catalyst for their proposal. Those rules, once a cornerstone of Obama-era internet policy, mandated that ISPs treat all data equally, barring them from prioritizing certain websites or services over others. The memo argues that the FCC’s reversal—upheld under subsequent administrations—stripped away safeguards, leading to higher costs and uneven access for consumers. “When the federal government walked away from net neutrality, it left Pennsylvanians vulnerable to corporate whims,” Smith-Wade-El said in a statement accompanying the memo.
By classifying ISPs as Public Utilities, the bill would subject companies like Comcast, Spectrum, Verizon, and AT&T to heightened oversight, akin to how electric or water providers are regulated according to a description of the bill posted online. This shift, the lawmakers contend, would ensure that internet access—a modern necessity—remains affordable and impartial across the state. “Internet isn’t a luxury; it’s a lifeline,” Fiedler added. “We can’t let a handful of corporations decide who gets fair access and who doesn’t.”
The proposal arrives amid a broader national debate over internet governance, with states like California and New York having pursued their own net neutrality laws after the FCC’s rollback. Critics of such measures, including ISP lobbyists, argue that state-level regulations could fragment the internet landscape and stifle innovation. Supporters, however, see Pennsylvania’s move as a vital stand against price gouging and digital discrimination.
While the bill’s specifics are still being finalized, its circulation signals growing momentum among state Democrats to address a digital divide exacerbated by federal inaction. Once introduced, it will face scrutiny in a legislature where partisan divides could complicate passage. For now, Smith-Wade-El and Fiedler are rallying support, framing their effort as a fight for equity in an increasingly connected world.
Please follow us on Facebook and X for more news, tips, and reviews. Need cord cutting tech support? Join our Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help. You can follow Luke on X HERE.
