Newsmax Broadcasting, LLC has launched a federal antitrust lawsuit against Fox News and its parent company, Fox Corporation, accusing them of orchestrating a deliberate and unlawful campaign to stifle competition in the right-leaning pay TV news market. The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, claims that Fox has abused its dominant position to suppress rivals, particularly Newsmax, resulting in significant harm to competition, consumers, and Newsmax’s business prospects.
The complaint alleges that Fox News, widely regarded as a cornerstone of right-leaning news, wields substantial market power due to its status as a must-have channel for pay TV distributors. This dominance allows Fox to impose restrictive terms on distributors, effectively pressuring them to limit or exclude other right-leaning news channels like Newsmax from their lineups. According to the suit, Fox’s tactics have hindered Newsmax’s ability to secure broader distribution, delaying its growth and costing the company significant revenue from advertising, marketing, and cable licensing fees. The alleged actions have also increased Newsmax’s operational costs, further undermining its ability to compete.
Newsmax asserts that Fox’s exclusionary practices violate Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, as well as the Florida Antitrust Act and the Florida Deceptive & Unfair Trade Practices Act. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages, which, under federal law, would be tripled if Newsmax prevails, potentially exposing Fox to substantial financial penalties. Additionally, Newsmax is requesting a permanent injunction to halt Fox’s alleged anticompetitive behavior and prevent future exclusionary practices.
The suit contends that Fox’s actions have not only harmed Newsmax but also damaged the broader right-leaning pay TV news market. By limiting the presence of competing channels, Fox has reduced consumer choice and driven up costs for viewers seeking conservative news content. Newsmax argues that, absent Fox’s interference, it would have achieved greater distribution, higher audience numbers, and stronger advertiser interest much sooner, establishing itself as a more valuable media entity.
The litigation, represented by the law firm Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, underscores Newsmax’s claim that Fox’s campaign has delayed its growth in the rapidly evolving virtual Multichannel Video Programming Distributor (vMVPD) sector, a critical area for modern media distribution. The outcome of this lawsuit could reshape the competitive landscape of right-leaning pay TV news, with implications for distributors, advertisers, and viewers alike.
Please follow us on Facebook and X for more news, tips, and reviews. Need cord cutting tech support? Join our Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help. You can find Luke on X HERE.